Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Golden Ratio Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Golden Ratio Analysis

Golden Ratio Analysis is a method for evaluating compositional balance based on the golden ratio (phi, approximately 1.618), a mathematical proportion found throughout nature and classical art. This analysis assesses whether design elements adhere to golden ratio proportions, which some claim enhance aesthetic appeal and visual harmony.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Golden Ratio Analysis
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / visual-arts
  • Livio, M. (2002). The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number. Broadway Books. · URL
  • Markowsky, G. (1992). Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(1), 2–19. · DOI 10.1080/07468342.1992.11973428
  • Fedorov, G., Vititnev, N., & Polezhaev, A. (2014). The Myth of the Golden Ratio in Facial Attractiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1048. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyColor Harmony Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGestalt Principles Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyImage Aesthetics Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVisual Balance Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVisual Complexity Measuremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account