Method evidence record

God Image Measurement

God image measurement quantifies the emotional, relational picture a believer holds of God — not the doctrines they affirm, but how they experience the divine as, say, loving or wrathful, accepting or rejecting, near or distant, controlling or permissive. Peter Benson and Bernard Spilka's 1973 study established the empirical approach: they measured the God image along evaluative dimensions and showed that it is systematically tied to the self, with people higher in self-esteem and internal locus of control picturing a more loving and accepting God. The tradition distinguishes the God image (the affect-laden, experienced representation) from the God concept (the formally professed theological description) and measures the former as a multidimensional latent construct from ratings of attributed divine characteristics.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

God Image / God Concept Measurement (Loving and Controlling God Representations)

Taxonomic method record · latent-structure / religious-studies

Benson, P., & Spilka, B. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12(3), 297-310. · DOI 10.2307/1384430

Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyCentrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketReligious Doubt Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketReligious Orientation Scale (ROS)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.