Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Female Sexual Function Index/Evidence
Method evidence record

Female Sexual Function Index

The FSFI is a 19-item multidimensional self-report instrument designed to assess sexual function in women across the lifespan. Developed by Rosen and colleagues in 2000, it measures six core domains of sexual response and has become a gold standard in both clinical and research settings for evaluating female sexual dysfunction.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / urology-gynecology
  • Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., & D'Agostino, R. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26(2), 191–208. · DOI 10.1080/009262300278597
  • Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(1), 1–20. · DOI 10.1080/00926230590475206
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyFemale Sexual Distress Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyInternational Index of Erectile Functionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMenopause Rating Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySexual Satisfaction Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account