Explainable Sentence Embeddings
Explainable sentence embeddings combine dense sentence representation learning with post-hoc or intrinsic interpretability tools — such as probing classifiers, LIME, SHAP, or attention attribution — to reveal what linguistic and semantic information is encoded in a sentence vector and why a downstream model makes a given prediction. The goal is to retain the representational power of modern encoders while making their behavior auditable.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Conneau, A., Kruszewski, G., Lample, G., Barrault, L., & Baroni, M. (2018). What you can cram into a single $\vec{v}$ector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, pp. 2126–2136. · URL
- Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of KDD 2016, pp. 1135–1144. · DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939778
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.