Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
EDE-Q/Evidence
Method evidence record

EDE-Q

The EDE-Q is a 28-item self-report questionnaire derived from the gold-standard Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) interview. Developed by Fairburn and Beglin in 1993, it measures the cognitive, behavioural, and attitudinal features of eating disorders. It is widely used in both research and clinical screening because it captures the core psychopathology of eating disorders without requiring a trained interviewer.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / clinical-psychology
  • Fairburn, C. G., & Beglin, S. J. (1994). Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self-report questionnaire? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16(4), 363–370. · DOI 10.1002/1098-108X(199412)16:4<363::AID-EAT2260160405>3.0.CO;2-#
  • Mond, J. M., Hay, P. J., Rodgers, B., Owen, C., & Beumont, P. J. V. (2004). Validity of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in screening for eating disorders in community samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(5), 551–567. · DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00161-X
  • Luce, K. H., & Crowther, J. H. (2007). The reliability of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire International (EDE-QI). International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(6), 549–552. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyBESmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBSQmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySCOFFmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyTFEQmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyYFASmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account