Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Double-blind AB design/Evidence
Method evidence record

Double-blind AB design

The double-blind AB design is a single-subject experimental approach that sequences a baseline phase (A) and an intervention phase (B) while concealing phase allocation from both the participant and the outcome assessor. It merges the idiographic focus of single-case methodology with the bias-control mechanism of double-blinding, making it especially useful in clinical rehabilitation, pain research, and behavioral medicine when objective measurement of an individual's response to treatment is the primary goal.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Double-blind AB Single-Subject Experimental Design
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / experimental-design
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. · ISBN 978-0195030440
  • Backman, C. L., & Harris, S. R. (1999). Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: Comparisons and contrasts. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(2), 170–176. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketAB Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketABA Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketABAB designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketMultiple Baseline Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketSingle-Subject Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account