Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Critical Incident Technique in Information Behavior/Evidence
Method evidence record

Critical Incident Technique in Information Behavior

The Critical Incident Technique (CIT), set out by John Flanagan in his 1954 Psychological Bulletin article, is a flexible set of procedures for collecting first-hand accounts of specific, observable incidents that were especially helpful or unhelpful in achieving some aim, and content-analyzing them to understand effective and ineffective behaviour. In library and information science it has become a widely used method for studying information seeking and use: instead of asking people in the abstract how they look for information, researchers ask them to recount concrete recent episodes — a time they urgently needed information, succeeded or failed to find it, encountered a barrier, or used a source to good or ill effect. Analyzing many such incidents yields grounded categories of information needs, behaviours, barriers and source roles. A 2025 Libri review documents the technique's broad application across LIS information-behaviour research.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Critical Incident Technique in Information Behavior (Flanagan's CIT Applied to Information Seeking and Use)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / library-information-science
  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358. · DOI 10.1037/h0061470
  • Sadeghi, H., Nowkarizi, M., & Tajafari, M. (2025). Applications of the Critical Incident Technique in Library and Information Science Research: A Literature Review. Libri, 75(2), 145-157. · DOI 10.1515/libri-2024-0065
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyInformation Encountering Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyInformation Horizons Mappingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySense-Making Methodologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account