Critical Incident Technique in Information Behavior
The Critical Incident Technique (CIT), set out by John Flanagan in his 1954 Psychological Bulletin article, is a flexible set of procedures for collecting first-hand accounts of specific, observable incidents that were especially helpful or unhelpful in achieving some aim, and content-analyzing them to understand effective and ineffective behaviour. In library and information science it has become a widely used method for studying information seeking and use: instead of asking people in the abstract how they look for information, researchers ask them to recount concrete recent episodes — a time they urgently needed information, succeeded or failed to find it, encountered a barrier, or used a source to good or ill effect. Analyzing many such incidents yields grounded categories of information needs, behaviours, barriers and source roles. A 2025 Libri review documents the technique's broad application across LIS information-behaviour research.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358. · DOI 10.1037/h0061470
- Sadeghi, H., Nowkarizi, M., & Tajafari, M. (2025). Applications of the Critical Incident Technique in Library and Information Science Research: A Literature Review. Libri, 75(2), 145-157. · DOI 10.1515/libri-2024-0065
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.