Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Cortex Ratio Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Cortex Ratio Analysis

Cortex ratio analysis is a quantitative method for assessing whether a lithic assemblage represents the complete reduction of the stone present, or whether pieces have been carried into or out of the deposit. Its insight is that every stone nodule begins entirely covered by a weathered outer rind, or cortex, and that knapping progressively removes this cortex as flakes are struck; a complete, undisturbed reduction event should therefore retain a predictable amount of cortical surface relative to the volume of stone it contains. By measuring the cortical surface area actually observed across all artifacts and dividing it by the cortical surface area expected from the assemblage's total volume, Douglass and colleagues derived a single index — the cortex ratio — that diagnoses assemblage completeness. A ratio near one indicates an intact assemblage, less than one indicates that cortical pieces were removed, and more than one indicates that cortical material was imported. Building on the macroscopic measurement conventions Andrefsky systematizes, the method turns cortex from a qualitative stage indicator into a rigorous test of artifact transport and site formation.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Cortex Ratio Analysis (Observed-to-Expected Cortical Surface Area for Assemblage Completeness)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / archaeology
  • Douglass, M. J., Holdaway, S. J., Fanning, P. C., & Shiner, J. I. (2008). An Assessment and Archaeological Application of Cortex Measurement in Lithic Assemblages. American Antiquity, 73(3), 513-526. · DOI 10.1017/S0002731600046849
  • Andrefsky, W. (2005). Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521615006
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyChaine Operatoiremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDebitage Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account