Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Corporatism Index/Evidence
Method evidence record

Corporatism Index

A corporatism index is a quantitative scaling of how centralized and coordinated a country's system of wage bargaining and interest intermediation is. Where the conceptual corporatism framework describes the institutional pattern in which peak associations of labor and capital negotiate with the state, a corporatism index turns that pattern into comparable numbers. The two landmark efforts are Alan Siaroff's 1999 integrated scale for 24 industrial democracies and Lane Kenworthy's 2003 systematic review and reconstruction of the available indicators. Both combine measures such as bargaining centralization, wage-setting coordination, union and employer organizational concentration, and the degree of tripartite concertation into a composite score that ranks countries from pluralist and decentralized at the low end to strongly corporatist and coordinated at the high end.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Quantitative Index of Corporatism and Wage-Bargaining Coordination
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / political-economy
  • Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), 175-205. · DOI 10.1111/1475-6765.00467
  • Kenworthy, L. (2003). Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism. International Journal of Sociology, 33(3), 10-44. · DOI 10.1080/15579336.2003.11770279
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyCorporatism Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPower Resources Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyWelfare Regime Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account