Method evidence record
Conover-Iman Test
The Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
Conover-Iman Post-Hoc Multiple Comparison Test
Taxonomic method record · regression-model / statistics
- Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. · URL
- Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A. & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric Statistical Methods (3rd ed.). Wiley. · ISBN 978-0470387375
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
No curated claims yet
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.