Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia/Evidence
Method evidence record

Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia

The Communication Confidence Rating Scale (CCRS or CRSA) is a brief self-report measure of perceived communication self-efficacy and confidence in communication situations among adults with aphasia. Unlike objective measures of language ability (Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination) or quality-of-life impact (Aphasia Impact Questionnaire), the CCRS focuses specifically on confidence—the degree to which a person with aphasia believes they can successfully communicate in everyday scenarios. High CCRS scores reflect psychological readiness to engage in communication despite linguistic deficits; low scores indicate anxiety and avoidance despite preserved communication ability.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Communication Confidence Rating Scale for People with Aphasia (CCRS or CRSA)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / speech-language-pathology
  • Bays, C. L. (2003). Stroke Recovery: What Does the Literature Tell Us? Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 35(5), 250–260. · URL
  • Hersh, D., Worrall, L., O'Neill, G., Sherratt, S., & Hersh, D. (2012). 'I'm Not Aphonic, I'm Aphasic': Improving the Written Communication of People with Aphasia in Hospital. Aphasiology, 26(2), 175–188. · URL
  • Hilari, K., Wiggins, R. D., Roy, P., Byng, S., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life in People with Chronic Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(2), 353–364. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyAphasia Impact Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoston Aphasia Severity Rating Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVoice Handicap Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account