Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Collaboration Distance and Erdős Number Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Collaboration Distance and Erdős Number Analysis

Collaboration distance analysis measures how closely connected scientists are through chains of co-authorship. Two researchers who have written a paper together are at distance 1; if they share a co-author but never wrote together, distance 2; and so on. The most famous instance is the Erdős number, the collaboration distance to the prolific mathematician Paul Erdős, popularized by the Erdős Number Project and analyzed by Rodrigo de Castro and Jerrold Grossman. M. E. J. Newman's landmark 2001 PNAS study generalized this idea, constructing large co-authorship networks across physics, biomedicine, and computer science and showing that they are 'small worlds': despite millions of authors, typical shortest paths are short and local clustering is high. Collaboration distance analysis thus characterizes the connectivity and reach of scientific communities through the geometry of their co-authorship graphs.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Collaboration Distance and Erdős Number Analysis (Geodesics in Co-Authorship Networks)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / bibliometrics
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404-409. · DOI 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
  • De Castro, R., & Grossman, J. W. (1999). Famous trails to Paul Erdős. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 21(3), 51-63. · DOI 10.1007/BF03025416
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyGarfield's Law of Concentrationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRelative Specialization / Activity Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyScientific Collaboration Index (Co-Authorship Intensity)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account