Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
CHIEF Environmental Barriers/Evidence
Method evidence record

CHIEF Environmental Barriers

The Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors, known as CHIEF, is a self-report instrument that quantifies the environmental barriers people with disabilities encounter in daily life. Developed by Whiteneck and colleagues in 2004, it operationalizes the environmental-factors component of the WHO ICF, which holds that disability arises from the interaction between a person and their surroundings rather than from impairment alone. CHIEF asks respondents about barriers across five domains — physical and structural, attitudinal and support, services and assistance, productivity, and policy — and for each potential barrier it captures two things: how often the barrier is encountered (frequency) and how big a problem it is when encountered (magnitude). The defining feature of the instrument is that these two ratings are multiplied into a frequency-by-magnitude product, so that a barrier counts for more if it is both common and serious. These products are averaged into domain scores and an overall score, giving a quantitative profile of the environmental obstacles a person faces.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF)
Taxonomic method record · latent-structure / disability-studies
  • Whiteneck, G. G., Harrison-Felix, C. L., Mellick, D. C., Brooks, C. A., Charlifue, S. B., & Gerhart, K. A. (2004). Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(8), 1324-1335. · DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.027
  • World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO. · ISBN 9789241545426
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Used in the same domainEnvironmental Barriers Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyHandicap Quantification (CHART)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPerson-Environment Fit (Disability)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account