Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Business Continuity Impact Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Business Continuity Impact Analysis

Business continuity impact analysis, usually called business impact analysis or BIA, is the process of determining how the impact of disrupting an organization's activities grows over time and using that understanding to set recovery priorities and targets. Rather than asking what might go wrong — the job of risk assessment — the BIA asks what it would cost the organization if a given activity stopped, for an hour, a day, a week, and how quickly each activity must therefore be restored. ISO 22301, the international standard for business continuity management systems, makes the BIA a foundational requirement: it drives the recovery time objectives, recovery point objectives and resource requirements on which continuity plans are built. ISO/IEC 31010 situates impact analysis within the broader family of risk-assessment techniques. The BIA's distinctive contribution is its focus on time: impact is not a single figure but a curve that rises as a disruption lengthens.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Business Continuity Impact Analysis (Business Impact Analysis, BIA)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / disaster-studies
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 22301:2019 Security and resilience — Business continuity management systems — Requirements. ISO, Geneva. · URL
  • International Organization for Standardization. (2019). IEC 31010:2019 Risk management — Risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC, Geneva. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyMulti-Hazard Risk Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPreliminary Hazard Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySemi-Quantitative Risk Matrix Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account