Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Bark and Mel Scales/Evidence
Method evidence record

Bark and Mel Scales

Bark and Mel scales are perceptual frequency scales that map physical frequency (Hz) to perceived pitch and auditory perception. Formalized by Zwicker (Bark, 1961) and Stevens (Mel, 1937), these non-linear scales reflect how the human ear processes sound. Bark scale divides hearing into 24 critical bands; Mel scale models pitch perception. Both are essential for audio feature extraction, speech processing, and designing audio systems that align with human hearing.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Perceptual Frequency Scales for Audio Analysis and Perception
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / acoustics
  • Zwicker, E. (1961). Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33(2), 248–248. · URL
  • Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J., & Newman, E. B. (1937). A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8(3), 185–190. · DOI 10.1121/1.1915893
  • Moore, B. C. J. (2012). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (6th ed.). Academic Press. · ISBN 978-0123914232
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyCepstral Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyFxLMS Active Noise Controlmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyLinear Predictive Codingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPsychoacoustic Maskingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySpeech Intelligibilitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account