Adaptive Competing Risks Analysis
Adaptive competing risks analysis combines the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard framework — which models the cumulative incidence of one cause of failure in the presence of other mutually exclusive causes — with adaptive or group-sequential interim monitoring rules. This allows a clinical trial or observational study to be modified mid-course (e.g., sample size reassessment, early stopping) based on accumulating competing-risk data while maintaining pre-specified type I error control.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. · DOI 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144
- Beyersmann, J., Allignol, A., & Schumacher, M. (2012). Competing Risks and Multistate Models with R. Springer. · ISBN 978-1461420767
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.