Probit Regression Model
Also known as: probit regression, normit model, Probit Modeli
The probit model is a regression method for a binary (0/1) outcome that maps a linear index of the predictors through the standard normal cumulative distribution function to produce a probability. It is a classical discrete-choice alternative to logistic regression, developed in standard econometrics treatments such as Greene's Econometric Analysis (2018).
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Use the probit model when the dependent variable is binary and the goal is prediction or classification, with a reasonable sample size (at least about 50 observations). It assumes a genuinely binary outcome and predictors that are not strongly collinear. It is a natural choice in econometric settings where a normally distributed latent error is a sensible story, and it works on cross-sectional or longitudinal data. It is less suitable for very small samples or when predictors are highly collinear.
Strengths & limitations
- Handles a binary outcome cleanly, keeping fitted probabilities inside the valid 0-1 range.
- Rooted in a latent-variable model with a normally distributed error, giving it a clear theoretical interpretation in econometrics.
- Well supported by classification diagnostics such as the ROC curve and AUC, and by marginal-effects reporting for interpretation.
- Coefficients are not directly interpretable as effects on the probability; marginal effects (dy/dx) must be computed separately.
- Requires a moderate sample (about 50 or more observations) and breaks down when predictors are strongly collinear.
- Estimation relies on numerical maximum likelihood, which can fail to converge when the outcome is near-perfectly separated by the predictors.
Frequently asked
How does probit differ from logistic regression?
Both model a binary outcome through a linear index, but probit passes the index through the standard normal CDF (Φ) while logistic regression uses the logistic CDF. The two usually give very similar fitted probabilities; probit is often preferred when a normally distributed latent error is the natural assumption, logit when interpretable odds ratios are wanted.
Why can't I read probit coefficients directly?
Because the coefficients act through the nonlinear normal curve, a one-unit change in a predictor does not move the probability by a fixed amount. To interpret the impact, report marginal effects (dy/dx), which translate each coefficient into its effect on the predicted probability.
How large a sample do I need?
Around 50 observations is a sensible minimum. Maximum-likelihood estimates are unstable in small samples, and convergence problems become more likely, especially when the outcome is nearly separated by the predictors.
How do I assess the fit?
Check goodness of fit with a Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and evaluate classification performance with the ROC curve and AUC. These complement the coefficient and marginal-effect estimates.
Sources
- Greene, W. H. (2018). Econometric Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson. ISBN: 978-0134461366
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Probit Regression Model. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/econometrics/probit-model
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Instrumental Variables in Health ResearchHealth Economics↔ compare
- Logistic RegressionResearch Statistics↔ compare
- OLS RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
- Panel Fixed EffectsEconometrics↔ compare
- Quantile RegressionEconometrics↔ compare