Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Ecology›Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity
Process / pipelinePhylogenetics

Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity

Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) · Also known as: phylogenetic diversity, PD, evolutionary distinctiveness, branch length

Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity (PD), introduced by David Faith (1992), measures the evolutionary diversity within a community by summing the branch lengths of a phylogenetic tree connecting all species. Unlike species richness, which counts species equally regardless of evolutionary relationships, PD weights species by their evolutionary distinctiveness: a community with evolutionarily distant species has higher PD than one dominated by recently diverged species. PD is widely used in conservation to prioritize protection of species and habitats that preserve evolutionary history.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity
Beta Diversity Partition…Functional DiversityPopulation Viability Ana…Species Accumulation

When to use it

Use Faith's PD when conservation goals include preserving evolutionary heritage, prioritizing species, or comparing communities. Requires a phylogenetic tree of adequate resolution. Most useful when phylogenetic tree is well-supported and reliable.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Intuitive measure that incorporates evolutionary relationships, aligning conservation with evolutionary heritage
  • Computationally simple: just sum branch lengths
  • Enables phylogenetically informed conservation: identifies species whose loss would disproportionately reduce evolutionary diversity
  • Works with molecular data to infer evolutionary relationships for data-poor organisms
Limitations
  • Heavily dependent on tree topology and branch length accuracy; phylogenetic uncertainty propagates to PD estimates
  • Cannot be directly compared across different parts of the tree; loses absolute scale
  • Sensitive to unresolved nodes and polytomies (multiple species diverging simultaneously); PD is ill-defined if tree has many polytomies
  • Does not account for functional or ecological diversity; evolutionarily distinct species may have similar ecological roles

Frequently asked

How does Faith's PD differ from species richness?

Species richness counts species equally regardless of evolutionary distance. A community of five congeners (closely related) has the same species richness as a community with representatives from five families. But the family-rich community has much higher PD because it spans more evolutionary time. PD aligns conservation with preserving evolutionary history.

What if my phylogenetic tree is uncertain?

Use trees from multiple analyses, Bayesian posterior distributions, or bootstrap trees to assess PD sensitivity. Compute PD for each tree and report the range. If PD estimates vary widely across trees, phylogenetic uncertainty is large and conservation decisions should be robust to that uncertainty.

How do I prioritize species for conservation using PD?

Use evolutionary distinctiveness (ED): the contribution of each species to total community PD. Species with high ED (long isolated branches) contribute more to PD than do related species. Prioritize protection of species with high ED relative to their extinction risk (the ED/risk ratio identifies most-important conservation targets).

Sources

  1. Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 ↗
  2. Steel, M., & Mooers, A. O. (2010). The expected value of shed phylogenetic diversity. PLoS Biology, 8(9), e1000475. link ↗
  3. Redding, D. W., & Mooers, A. O. (2006). Incorporating evolutionary measures into conservation prioritization. Conservation Biology, 20(6), 1670-1678. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00555.x ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity (PD). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/ecology/faiths-phylogenetic-diversity

Related methods

Beta Diversity PartitioningFunctional DiversityPopulation Viability AnalysisSpecies Accumulation

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Beta Diversity PartitioningEcology↔ compare
  • Functional DiversityEcology↔ compare
  • Population Viability AnalysisEcology↔ compare
  • Species AccumulationEcology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Beta Diversity PartitioningSpecies Accumulation

Similar methods

Phylogenetic AnalysisPhylogenetic Independent ContrastsBayesian Phylogenetic AnalysisFunctional DiversityBeta Diversity PartitioningBray-Curtis DissimilarityBiodiversity Index in ForestsMachine learning-assisted phylogenetic analysis

Related reference concepts

Phylogenetics and MacroevolutionSpecies Richness and Diversity IndicesPhylogenetic Inference MethodsTree Terminology and RootingBiodiversity Patterns and MeasurementPhylogenetic Inference

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity (Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity (PD)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/ecology/faiths-phylogenetic-diversity · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
David Faith
Subfamily
Phylogenetics
Year
1992
Type
evolutionary diversity quantification
Related methods
Beta Diversity PartitioningFunctional DiversityPopulation Viability AnalysisSpecies Accumulation
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account