Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Spherical extension of TOPSIS
MCDMRankingspherical

Spherical extension of TOPSIS

SF-TOPSIS (Spherical extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kutlu Gündoğdu & Kahraman in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

SF-TOPSIS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

SF-TOPSIS (Kutlu Gündoğdu & Kahraman 2019) extends TOPSIS to Spherical Fuzzy Sets (μ²+ν²+π² ≤ 1, hesitancy π independent). Pipeline: SWAM/SWGM aggregation of DM judgments → weighted SF matrix via SF multiplication ⊗ → defuzzify by score S(α) = (μ−π)² − (ν−π)² → SF-PIS / SF-NIS extraction (max/min score per criterion) → normalized Euclidean SF distance D(X, X*) and D(X, X⁻) (factor 1/(2n)) → revised closeness ratio ξ(X) = D(X,X*)/D_min(X,X*) − D(X,X⁻)/D_max(X,X⁻) → ASCENDING rank (smaller ξ = better).

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., Kahraman, C. (2019). Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-181401 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Spherical extension of TOPSIS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/sf-topsis

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

SF-TODIMSF-MOORASF-COPRASSF-GRASF-ARASSF-COCOSOSF-MABACSF-WASPAS

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyDecision Making SkillsEvaluation Criteria

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — SF-TOPSIS (Spherical extension of TOPSIS). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/sf-topsis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Kutlu Gündoğdu & Kahraman
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2019
Type
Spherical outranking/ranking — Spherical Fuzzy Set (SFS: μ, ν, π; μ²+ν²+π² ≤ 1)
Value Space
spherical
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account