Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Rough-SAW — Rough extension of SAW
MCDMRankingrough

Rough-SAW — Rough extension of SAW

ROUGH-SAW (Rough-SAW — Rough extension of SAW) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stević, Ž. Pamučar, D. Zavadskas, E.K. Ćirović, G. Prentkovskis, O. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

ROUGH-SAW
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

rough-saw extends SAW to handle Rough uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via midpoint (L+U)/2 before ranking.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Ćirović, G., Prentkovskis, O. (2017). The Selection of Wagons for the Internal Transport of a Logistics Company: A Novel Approach Based on Rough BWM and Rough SAW Methods. Symmetry DOI: 10.3390/sym9110264 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Rough-SAW — Rough extension of SAW. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/rough-saw

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

ROUGH-WASPASROUGH-COPRASQR-SAWROUGH-MARCOSROUGH-MOORAP-SAWPF-SAWROUGH-VIKOR

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresDecision Making SkillsParticipative Decision MakingMultidimensional Scaling

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — ROUGH-SAW (Rough-SAW — Rough extension of SAW). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/rough-saw · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Stević, Ž. Pamučar, D. Zavadskas, E.K. Ćirović, G. Prentkovskis, O.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2017
Type
Rough outranking/ranking — Rough number (lower approximation L, upper approximation U)
Value Space
rough
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account