Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›qR-ARAS — q-Rung Orthopair extension of ARAS
MCDMRankingQ rung orthopair

qR-ARAS — q-Rung Orthopair extension of ARAS

QR-ARAS (qR-ARAS — q-Rung Orthopair extension of ARAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yager, R. R. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

QR-ARAS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

QR-ARAS extends ARAS to q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Numbers. Pipeline: (1) cost criteria are complemented via (μ,ν)→(ν,μ); (2) a fictitious optimal q-ROFN row A_0 is built coordinate-wise; (3) each row (including A_0) is aggregated by q-ROFWA into a single q-ROFN; (4) the q-ROFN is reduced to a crisp score S_i = (1+μ_i^q−ν_i^q)/2 ∈ [0,1]; (5) utility K_i = S_i/S_0 ∈ [0,1] is ranked descending. The q parameter (≥1) is analyst-specified; q=1 reduces to IF-ARAS, q=2 to PF-ARAS, q=3 to FF-ARAS.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Yager, R. R. (2017). Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). qR-ARAS — q-Rung Orthopair extension of ARAS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/qr-aras

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

QR-COPRASQR-MOORAQR-EDASQR-VIKORQR-WASPASQR-PROMETHEEQR-TOPSISQR-SAW

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingQ MethodologyCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyQuadratic Discriminant AnalysisWeighted Scores

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — QR-ARAS (qR-ARAS — q-Rung Orthopair extension of ARAS). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/qr-aras · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Yager, R. R.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2017
Type
q-Rung Orthopair outranking/ranking — q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Number (q-ROFN: μ, ν; μ^q+ν^q ≤ 1, q ≥ 1)
Value Space
Q rung orthopair
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account