Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSources
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Sustainability Criteria-Level Preference Ranking
MCDMRankingcrisp

Sustainability Criteria-Level Preference Ranking

PROSA-C (Sustainability Criteria-Level Preference Ranking) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Ziemba, P. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

When to use it

Use PROSA-C when criteria have different sustainability profiles (ESG) and these should influence weight allocation.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Ziemba, P. (2019). PROSA-C: preferences-based sustainability assessments at the criteria level of MCDA models. Sustainability link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Sustainability Criteria-Level Preference Ranking. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/prosa-c

Similar methods

PHF-COPRASROUGH-COPRASOCRAPROBIDCOPRASPIF-COPRASTOPSIS-SORTPIF-TODIM

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingDecision Support SystemsSustainabilityEvaluation CriteriaWeighted ScoresPolicy Analysis

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — PROSA-C (Sustainability Criteria-Level Preference Ranking). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/prosa-c · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Ziemba, P.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2019
Type
TOPSIS extended with sustainability coefficients at criterion level
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
partial
Rank Reversal
No
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account