Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitations🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Picture Fuzzy variant of CIMAS (Kara et al. 2024)
MCDMWeight Subjectivepicture

Picture Fuzzy variant of CIMAS (Kara et al. 2024)

PIF-CIMAS (Picture Fuzzy variant of CIMAS (Kara et al. 2024)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

PIF-CIMAS
PIF-ARTASIPIF-CIMAS-ARTASIPIF-CODASPIF-COPRASPIF-EDASPIF-MARCOSPIF-MOORAPIF-SAWPIF-TODIMPIF-TOPSIS

+1 more

When to use it

PIF-CIMAS extends CIMAS (Bošković et al. 2023) by replacing crisp expert/criterion ratings with Picture Fuzzy linguistic variables aggregated via score function Sc(W) = (1/3)(μ + (1−η) + (1−ν)). Reliability is verified via a second round.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. (2024). A picture fuzzy CIMAS-ARTASI model for website performance analysis in human resource management. Applied Soft Computing DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111826 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Picture Fuzzy variant of CIMAS (Kara et al. 2024). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/pif-cimas

Related methods

PIF-ARTASIPIF-CIMAS-ARTASIPIF-CODASPIF-COPRASPIF-EDASPIF-MARCOSPIF-MOORAPIF-SAW

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • PIF-ARTASIDecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-CIMAS-ARTASIDecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-CODASDecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-COPRASDecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-EDASDecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-MARCOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-MOORADecision-making↔ compare
  • PIF-SAWDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

PIF-ARTASIPIF-CIMAS-ARTASIPIF-COPRASPIF-EDASPIF-MARCOSPIF-MOORAPIF-SAWPIF-TODIMPIF-TOPSISPIF-VIKOR

Similar methods

PIF-CIMAS-ARTASIPIF-ARTASIPIF-EDASPIF-ARASPIF-CODASPIF-COPRASPIF-VIKORPIF-MOORA

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresComputer and Information SciencesEvaluation CriteriaMathematical Models

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — PIF-CIMAS (Picture Fuzzy variant of CIMAS (Kara et al. 2024)). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/pif-cimas · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D.
Subfamily
Weight Subjective
Year
2024
Type
Picture Fuzzy criteria weighting via expert assessment (CIMAS) — PFWA aggregation
Value Space
picture
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
N/A
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
PIF-ARTASIPIF-CIMAS-ARTASIPIF-CODASPIF-COPRASPIF-EDASPIF-MARCOSPIF-MOORAPIF-SAW
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account