Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Modified PSI method for objective weighting (Modified Preference Selection Index weighting)
MCDMWeight Objectivecrisp

Modified PSI method for objective weighting (Modified Preference Selection Index weighting)

MPSI (Modified PSI method for objective weighting (Modified Preference Selection Index weighting)) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

MPSI
AHPSORTAPLOCOARASAROMANARTASICOBRACOCOSOCODAS

When to use it

MPSI extracts criterion weights from PSI's Preference Variation Values. Criteria with LOWER Φ_j (less variance, more consistent discrimination) get HIGHER weight. This is counterintuitive — it differs from ENTROPY and CRITIC which give higher weight to higher-variance criteria.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Results depend on the chosen normalisation, weights, and parameter settings.

Sources

  1. Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials & Design DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Modified PSI method for objective weighting (Modified Preference Selection Index weighting). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/mpsi

Related methods

AHPSORTAPLOCOARASAROMANARTASICOBRACOCOSOCODAS

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPSORTDecision-making↔ compare
  • APLOCODecision-making↔ compare
  • ARASDecision-making↔ compare
  • AROMANDecision-making↔ compare
  • ARTASIDecision-making↔ compare
  • COBRADecision-making↔ compare
  • COCOSODecision-making↔ compare
  • CODASDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

PSIN-PSISD-WEIGHTFUZZY-PSIIDOCRIWCRITICCCSDGINI-WEIGHT

Related reference concepts

Decision MakingWeighted ScoresDecision Support SystemsDecision Making SkillsCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyMultidimensional Scaling

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — MPSI (Modified PSI method for objective weighting (Modified Preference Selection Index weighting)). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/mpsi · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G.
Subfamily
Weight Objective
Year
2010
Type
Modified PSI variance-based objective weighting (weight extraction from PSI preference variation)
Value Space
crisp
Uncertainty
None
Compensation
N/A
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPSORTAPLOCOARASAROMANARTASICOBRACOCOSOCODAS
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account