Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Interval extension of TOPSIS
MCDMRankingInterval intuitionistic

Interval extension of TOPSIS

IV-TOPSIS (Interval extension of TOPSIS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Izadikhah, M. in 2006. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

IV-TOPSIS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

IV-TOPSIS extends crisp TOPSIS to bounded uncertainty represented as Interval Numbers IN: [L, U]. The Jahanshahloo–Lotfi–Izadikhah (2006) algorithm keeps both bounds throughout normalisation and weighting; the positive- and negative-ideal solutions are then assembled by taking max/min over the appropriate bound depending on whether each criterion is a benefit or a cost. Distances use the opposite bound (lower for d⁺ on benefits, upper for d⁻ on benefits, swapped for costs) so that the worst-case separation is measured. The final relative closeness C* is a crisp scalar in [0, 1] — no defuzzific

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Izadikhah, M. (2006). An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Applied Mathematics and Computation DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2005.08.048 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Interval extension of TOPSIS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/iv-topsis

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

IF-TOPSISGREY-TOPSISTOPSISFUZZY-TOPSISCUBIC-TOPSISN-TOPSISIV-TODIMIVIF-MABAC

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresEvaluation CriteriaMultidimensional ScalingDecision Making Skills

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — IV-TOPSIS (Interval extension of TOPSIS). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/iv-topsis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Izadikhah, M.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2006
Type
Interval outranking/ranking — Interval Number (IN: [a, b])
Value Space
Interval intuitionistic
Uncertainty
bounded
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account