Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›IVAIF-CODAS — Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS
MCDMRankingInterval intuitionistic

IVAIF-CODAS — Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS

IV-CODAS (IVAIF-CODAS — Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Yeni, F. B., Özçelik, G. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

IV-CODAS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

IVAIF-CODAS extends CODAS to handle Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy (IVAIF) data. DM assessments are expressed as IVAIFNs ([μL,μU],[vL,vU]) using a linguistic scale, then aggregated via IIFWA. The method uses IVAIF Euclidean and Hamming distances from the negative ideal solution. Higher AS score = better alternative. Threshold θ (default 0.02) controls when the Hamming distance refinement is activated.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Yeni, F. B., Özçelik, G. (2018). Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS Method for Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Problems. Group Decision and Negotiation DOI: 10.1007/s10726-018-9603-9 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). IVAIF-CODAS — Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/iv-codas

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

IVIF-CODAS-SORTIF-CODASIVIF-ARASIVIF-MABACIVIF-COPRASFUZZY-CODASIF-CODAS-SORTCODAS

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresEvaluation CriteriaDecision Making SkillsMultidimensional Scaling

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — IV-CODAS (IVAIF-CODAS — Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/iv-codas · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Yeni, F. B., Özçelik, G.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2018
Type
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy outranking — IVAIFS
Value Space
Interval intuitionistic
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
No
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account