Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Envelopment Analysis (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)
MCDMDEAhesitant

Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Envelopment Analysis (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)

HFPEA (Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Envelopment Analysis (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)) is a dea multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

HFPEA
HFEAHFGPEHFPE

When to use it

HFPEA ranks alternatives consistently with the decision maker's stated attribute priorities. An alternative efficient in HFEA but not in HFPEA is efficient only when allowed to over-emphasise its strongest criterion — which the preference ordering prevents. The improvement schedules reflect the preference-adjusted targets, not raw distance to frontier.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Zhou, W., Chen, J., Xu, Z. S., Meng, S. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Information Sciences DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.07.002 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Envelopment Analysis (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hfpea

Related methods

HFEAHFGPEHFPE

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • HFEADecision-making↔ compare
  • HFGPEDecision-making↔ compare
  • HFPEDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

HFEA

Similar methods

HFPEHFEAHFGPEHF-VIKORHFL-PROMETHEEHFLPR-PRIORITYHF-DFTPHF-COPRAS

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyCost-Effectiveness AnalysisPolicy AnalysisCost-Benefit Analysis

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — HFPEA (Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Envelopment Analysis (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/hfpea · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S.
Subfamily
DEA
Year
2018
Type
HFEA extension with ordinal attribute preference constraints — same score/deviation LP as HFEA but with additional weight ordering inequalities p g ≥ p t ≥ … ≥ p m encoding the decision maker's stated preference order over criteria; produces preference-consistent efficiency rankings and improvement schedules.
Value Space
hesitant
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
HFEAHFGPEHFPE
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account