Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS
MCDMRankinggrey

Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS

GREY-EDAS (Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

GREY-EDAS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

grey-edas extends EDAS to handle Grey uncertainty. All arithmetic operations (normalisation, weighting, distance computation) are performed using Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄]) algebra. The final scores are defuzzified via whitenisation: (x̲ + x̄)/2 before ranking.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. (2017). An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control DOI: 10.24846/v26i1y201701 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/grey-edas

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

GREY-CODASGREY-TOPSISGREY-WASPASGREY-MOORAGREY-COPRASGREY-ARASN-EDASEDAS

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingWeighted ScoresMultidimensional ScalingCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyEM Algorithm

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — GREY-EDAS (Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/grey-edas · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2017
Type
Grey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])
Value Space
grey
Uncertainty
bounded
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account