Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfalls🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Decision-making›Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of COPRAS
MCDMRankinghesitant

Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of COPRAS

DHF-COPRAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of COPRAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Ravichandran, K. S., Balasubramanian, K. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

ScholarGate
  1. MCDM
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

DHF-COPRAS
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

When to use it

DHF-COPRAS (Rani & Mishra 2020 HF-SWARA-COPRAS lifted to DHFE) is the dual-hesitant extension of COPRAS with integrated SWARA criterion weighting and entropy-based DE weighting. l decision experts each supply a DHFE matrix; DHFWA (Eq.8 lift of Zhu 2012 Eq.4) aggregates them into the AHF-D matrix using crisp DE weights λ_k (Eq.7 HFS-entropy or direct). Each AHF-D cell is defuzzified via the DHFE score s(d)=mean(h)−mean(g) (Zhu 2012 Def. 2) for SWARA ordering; SWARA Eqs.(9)–(11) yield criterion weights w_j. Cost columns are complemented (Zhu 2012 Eq.6 swap h↔g) and benefit/cost aggregates σ_i, v

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Follows a transparent, reproducible computational procedure that can be audited step by step.
  • Handles multiple criteria of differing scales and units within a single decision matrix.
Limitations
  • May exhibit rank reversal when alternatives are added to or removed from the set.
  • Assumes full compensation — a strong score on one criterion can offset a weak score on another.

Sources

  1. Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Ravichandran, K. S., Balasubramanian, K. (2020). Hesitant Fuzzy SWARA-Complex Proportional Assessment Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection (HF-SWARA-COPRAS). Symmetry DOI: 10.3390/sym12071152 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of COPRAS. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/dhf-copras

Related methods

AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • AHPDecision-making↔ compare
  • ANPDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWMDecision-making↔ compare
  • BWM-BAYESIANDecision-making↔ compare
  • CCSDDecision-making↔ compare
  • CILOSDecision-making↔ compare
  • CIMASDecision-making↔ compare
  • CRITICDecision-making↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

HF-COPRASDHF-TOPSISHF-WASPASHF-ARASDHF-VIKORDHF-TODIMDHF-EDASPHF-COPRAS

Related reference concepts

Decision Support SystemsDecision MakingCriteria for Decision-Making under Risk and UncertaintyDecision Making SkillsDelphi TechniqueWeighted Scores

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — DHF-COPRAS (Dual Hesitant Fuzzy extension of COPRAS). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/decision-making/dhf-copras · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Ravichandran, K. S., Balasubramanian, K.
Subfamily
Ranking
Year
2020
Type
Dual Hesitant outranking/ranking — Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Element (DHFE: h(x) membership set, g(x) non-membership set)
Value Space
hesitant
Uncertainty
epistemic
Compensation
full
Rank Reversal
Yes
Related methods
AHPANPBWMBWM-BAYESIANCCSDCILOSCIMASCRITIC
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account