Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Cryptography›Intrusion Detection System
Process / pipelineNetwork security monitoring

Intrusion Detection System

Network and Host-Based Intrusion Detection and Response Framework · Also known as: IDS, Network Intrusion Detection, Anomaly Detection System

An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) is a security tool that monitors network traffic and system activity to identify unauthorized access attempts, malware infections, and policy violations. Introduced by Dorothy Denning in 1987, IDS employs two main detection paradigms: signature-based (matching known attack patterns) and anomaly-based (identifying deviations from normal behavior).

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Intrusion Detection System
Penetration Testing Meth…TLS Protocol AnalysisVulnerability Assessment

When to use it

Deploy IDS at network perimeters (between internet and internal network) to detect external attacks, and on critical internal systems to detect insider threats. Use signature-based IDS for detecting known attacks with low false-positive rates; combine with anomaly-based IDS to catch novel attacks. Organizations should implement both network IDS (NIDS) and host-based IDS (HIDS) for defense-in-depth. IDS is essential in regulated environments (financial services, healthcare) where intrusion monitoring is mandated.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Provides real-time detection of active attacks without blocking legitimate traffic
  • Signature-based detection is fast and produces few false positives for known attacks
  • Anomaly-based detection can identify novel, previously unknown attacks
  • Generates forensic logs for incident investigation and regulatory compliance
Limitations
  • Signature-based systems cannot detect zero-day attacks (unknown vulnerabilities)
  • Anomaly-based systems suffer from high false-positive rates in complex networks
  • IDS cannot prevent attacks—only detect them; protection requires additional controls (firewall, patching)
  • High-volume network traffic creates monitoring and storage challenges; sampling or filtering may miss attacks

Frequently asked

What is the difference between IDS and a firewall?

A firewall enforces access control policies by allowing or denying traffic based on predefined rules (e.g., block port 23). An IDS monitors traffic to detect intrusions and suspicious behavior. Firewalls are proactive barriers; IDS is reactive detection. Both are necessary for defense-in-depth: the firewall blocks known threats, and IDS detects attacks that bypass the firewall.

Why do anomaly-based IDS have high false-positive rates?

Anomaly-based systems learn a baseline of 'normal' activity and alert on deviations. However, legitimate but unusual activities (software deployments, backups, legitimate large transfers) can trigger false alarms. As networks evolve and legitimate activity patterns change, baselines become outdated, requiring continuous tuning.

Can IDS detect encrypted traffic intrusions?

Traditional IDS cannot decrypt encrypted traffic (respecting privacy). However, modern systems analyze traffic metadata (flows, timing, packet sizes, volumes) to detect anomalies even without payload visibility. Some enterprise systems perform decryption on-path (with security risks), or organizations deploy host-based IDS that monitor encrypted content after decryption.

What is the difference between IDS and IPS?

An IDS (Intrusion Detection System) detects attacks and alerts. An IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) goes further, automatically taking action to block or prevent the attack (dropping packets, resetting connections). IPS is more aggressive and can block legitimate traffic if misconfigured; IDS is safer but requires manual response.

Sources

  1. Denning, D. E. (1987). An intrusion-detection model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(2), 222–232. DOI: 10.1109/TSE.1987.232894 ↗
  2. Lippmann, R. P., Kunkel, J. W., Base, D. J., Haines, J. W., Fried, D. J., Webster, S. E., & Wyschogrod, D. B. (2000). 1999 DARPA intrusion detection evaluation: Datasets. Technical Report, MIT Lincoln Laboratory. link ↗
  3. Garcia-Teodoro, P., Diaz-Verdejo, J., Maciá-Fernández, G., & García-Alonso, J. (2009). Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Techniques, systems and challenges. Computers & Security, 28(1–2), 18–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2008.08.003 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Network and Host-Based Intrusion Detection and Response Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/cryptography/intrusion-detection-system

Related methods

Penetration Testing MethodologyTLS Protocol AnalysisVulnerability Assessment

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Penetration Testing MethodologyCryptography↔ compare
  • TLS Protocol AnalysisCryptography↔ compare
  • Vulnerability AssessmentCryptography↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Penetration Testing MethodologyVulnerability Assessment

Similar methods

Deep Packet InspectionVulnerability AssessmentSemi-supervised Isolation ForestPenetration Testing MethodologyAutoencoder Anomaly DetectionOnline Autoencoder Anomaly DetectionLocal Outlier FactorOne-class SVM

Related reference concepts

Network SecuritySystems and Network SecurityMalware AnalysisAuthentication and Access ControlHealth Data Breaches and Incident ResponseNetwork Security (Computer Networks)

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Intrusion Detection System (Network and Host-Based Intrusion Detection and Response Framework). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/cryptography/intrusion-detection-system · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Dorothy Denning
Subfamily
Network security monitoring
Year
1987
Type
Security monitoring and anomaly detection
Related methods
Penetration Testing MethodologyTLS Protocol AnalysisVulnerability Assessment
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account