Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Urban Metabolism Analysis× | Urban Resilience Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field | Urban Studies | Urban Studies |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 1965 | 2016 |
| Originator≠ | Abel Wolman (the metabolism-of-cities concept) | Resilience-theory and urban-planning scholarship (synthesised by Meerow, Newell & Stults) |
| Type≠ | Accounting of material and energy inputs, stocks, and outputs of a city | Framework or composite index assessing a city's capacity to absorb and adapt to disturbance |
| Seminal source≠ | Wolman, A. (1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 178–190. DOI ↗ | Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. DOI ↗ |
| Aliases | Material Flow Analysis, Urban Material and Energy Flows, City Metabolism Accounting, Urban Mass Balance | City Resilience Index, Urban Resilience Framework, Resilience Capacity Assessment, Disaster Resilience of Place |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | Urban metabolism analysis treats a city as a living organism that ingests materials, water, energy and food and excretes wastes, emissions and outflows, accounting for these flows to understand and improve a city's resource use. Drawing on the biological metaphor that Abel Wolman introduced in his 1965 'The metabolism of cities', the method draws a system boundary around the urban area and constructs a mass and energy balance of everything entering, accumulating in, and leaving it. The resulting per-capita flows and efficiency indicators expose how resource-intensive a city is and where interventions could close material loops. | Urban resilience assessment evaluates how well a city can absorb, adapt to, and recover from shocks such as floods, earthquakes and pandemics and from chronic stresses such as poverty and ageing infrastructure. Most assessments are framework-driven composite indices: they define resilience dimensions — infrastructural, social, economic, ecological and institutional — gather indicators for each, normalise and weight them, and aggregate to a resilience score or profile. Because, as Meerow, Newell and Stults documented, 'urban resilience' is defined in conflicting ways across the literature, every assessment must first take a position on what resilience means, for whom, and against which disturbances. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|