ScholarGate
Assistant

Compare methods

Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.

Speech Act Analysis×Conversation Analysis×
FieldLinguisticsQualitative
FamilyProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Year of origin1962Late 1960s–1974 (foundational lectures 1964–1972; landmark article 1974)
OriginatorJ. L. Austin and John R. Searle (analytic method derived from speech act theory)Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
TypeQualitative pragmatic coding of utterances for illocutionary forceQualitative research method
Seminal sourceAustin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198245537Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. link ↗
AliasesIllocutionary Force Analysis, Speech Act Coding, Pragmatic Act AnalysisCA, talk-in-interaction, sequential analysis, interactional analysis
Related46
SummarySpeech act analysis is the empirical, qualitative method of examining real utterances for the actions they perform — promising, requesting, apologizing, warning, declaring — rather than merely for what they describe. Building on J. L. Austin's insight that saying is doing and on John Searle's systematic taxonomy of illocutionary acts, the analyst segments discourse into utterances, identifies the illocutionary force of each, classifies it (as a representative, directive, commissive, expressive, or declaration), and notes whether the act is performed directly or indirectly. It turns the philosophy of language into a coding procedure that can be applied to conversations, written texts, and elicited data.Conversation Analysis (CA) is a qualitative research method that examines the fine-grained sequential structure of naturally occurring talk and social interaction. Developed by sociologists Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson in the 1960s and 1970s, CA investigates how participants in a conversation accomplish social actions — such as invitations, refusals, or diagnoses — through the precise moment-by-moment organisation of their talk, including turn-taking, sequence structure, repair, and recipient design.
ScholarGateDataset
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Go to search Download slides

ScholarGateCompare methods: Speech Act Analysis · Conversation Analysis. Retrieved 2026-06-24 from https://scholargate.app/en/compare