Compare methods
Review your selected methods side by side; rows that differ are highlighted.
| Moral Foundations Questionnaire× | Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| Field≠ | Political Psychology | Social Psychology |
| Family | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Year of origin≠ | 2011 | 1981 |
| Originator≠ | Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt et al. | Bob Altemeyer |
| Type≠ | Self-report values inventory | Self-report Likert scale |
| Seminal source≠ | Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366-385. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| Aliases≠ | MFQ, MFQ-30, Moral Foundations Theory Questionnaire | RWA |
| Related | 4 | 4 |
| Summary≠ | The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 30-item self-report instrument developed by Graham, Haidt and colleagues (2011) to measure the degree to which people rely on five intuitive moral foundations: Care/harm, Fairness/cheating, Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Sanctity/degradation. It is the standard operationalization of Moral Foundations Theory, which argues that political and cultural moral disagreements arise from differing weights placed on these foundations. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateDataset ↗ |
|
|