Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Civil Engineering›Finite Strip Method
Process / pipelineSemi-analytical methods

Finite Strip Method

Finite Strip Method for Structural Analysis · Also known as: FSM, Strip method, Semi-analytical finite element

The finite strip method (FSM) is a semi-analytical numerical approach for analyzing prismatic or cylindrical structures by dividing them into strips in one direction and using analytical or exact solutions in the perpendicular direction. Developed by Cheung in 1976, FSM reduces computational cost and often provides superior accuracy for structures with regular geometry along one axis.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Finite Strip Method
BEM GeomechanicsIncremental Dynamic Anal…

When to use it

FSM is ideal for bridges with regular spans, cylindrical shells, curved panels, and shear walls in buildings where one dimension exhibits strong regularity. It is particularly efficient for dynamic analysis (vibration and seismic) where the number of DOFs must be minimized. However, it is not suitable for irregularly shaped structures or those with significant variations in one direction; full finite elements are then preferable.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Significantly reduces the number of degrees of freedom compared to full finite-element analysis, reducing computational time
  • Provides analytical accuracy in one direction, often yielding more precise results than pure FEM for regular structures
  • Natural handling of periodic loading and harmonic analysis due to basis function structure
  • Excellent for dynamic analysis (eigenvalue problems, modal analysis) with rapid convergence
  • Efficient for parametric studies and design optimization of structures with geometric regularity
Limitations
  • Requires structural regularity in one or more directions; cannot handle arbitrary geometries
  • Restrictions on support and loading conditions; concentrated loads require special treatment
  • Limited availability of commercial software; largely found in research and specialized applications
  • Difficulty handling local effects (cutouts, openings, reinforcement) without complicating the analysis
  • Less intuitive to practitioners familiar with standard finite elements; steeper learning curve

Frequently asked

How do I decide between FSM and full finite elements for my structure?

If your structure has uniform geometry along one or two directions (bridge decks, cylindrical tanks), FSM is more efficient. For irregular or complex shapes, full FEM is necessary. Run both methods on a simple test case to compare accuracy and computation time.

What basis functions should I use for displacement variations in the strip?

Polynomial functions (linear, quadratic, cubic) are common for beams and plates. Trigonometric functions (sine, cosine) are preferred for periodic or harmonic loading. The choice depends on the expected displacement pattern and boundary conditions. Convergence studies verify adequacy.

Can FSM handle nonlinear material behavior or large deformations?

Yes, but with increased complexity. Nonlinear behavior requires iterative solution algorithms similar to nonlinear FEM. Material nonlinearity and geometric nonlinearity can be incorporated but diminish the computational advantage of FSM. Use FSM primarily for linear or mildly nonlinear cases.

How do I incorporate local effects like openings or reinforcement into an FSM model?

Local effects require special treatment or mesh refinement in the affected region. Alternatively, use hybrid methods combining FSM with local FEM. For simple cases, perturbation methods or stress concentration factors approximate the effect of openings.

Sources

  1. Cheung, Y. K. (1976). Finite Strip Method in Structural Analysis. Pergamon Press. ISBN: 0-08-020191-5
  2. Cheung, M. S., & Cheung, Y. K. (1996). Refined finite strip method for thin-wall structures with columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(6), 700-712. link ↗
  3. Lau, D. T., & Cheung, Y. K. (2000). Vibration of cylinders and plates with variable thickness. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 29(3), 377-394. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Finite Strip Method for Structural Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/civil-engineering/finite-strip-method

Related methods

BEM GeomechanicsIncremental Dynamic Analysis

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • BEM GeomechanicsCivil Engineering↔ compare
  • Incremental Dynamic AnalysisCivil Engineering↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

BEM Geomechanics

Similar methods

Finite Element AnalysisBoundary Element MethodFinite Element Model UpdatingModal AnalysisBEM GeomechanicsStructural Form-FindingSeakeeping Strip TheoryGalerkin Method

Related reference concepts

Finite Element MethodsFinite-Element and Grid Field SolversFinite Difference MethodsNumerical Solution of Partial Differential EquationsFinite Volume MethodsMultigrid Methods

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Finite Strip Method (Finite Strip Method for Structural Analysis). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/civil-engineering/finite-strip-method · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Y. K. Cheung
Subfamily
Semi-analytical methods
Year
1976
Type
Reduced-dimension numerical method for prismatic structures
Related methods
BEM GeomechanicsIncremental Dynamic Analysis
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account