Hemolysis Assay
Hemolysis Assay Red Blood Cell Toxicity Evaluation · Also known as: RBC lysis assay, hemolytic compatibility test, hemolytic potential test
The hemolysis assay is a standard method for evaluating the blood compatibility of biomaterials by quantifying the extent to which a material or substance damages red blood cells (RBCs) and causes hemoglobin release. Codified in standards including ASTM F756 and ISO 10993-4, the hemolysis assay is essential for regulatory approval of blood-contacting devices such as stents, catheters, artificial heart valves, and hemodialysis membranes. The assay provides a simple, quantitative measure of hemolytic potential that correlates with clinical safety.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
The hemolysis assay is mandatory for regulatory approval of any blood-contacting medical device and is highly recommended for any biomaterial or pharmaceutical agent intended for intravenous or intravascular use. It is preferred for rapid screening of candidate materials before more expensive in vivo biocompatibility studies. However, hemolysis is only one aspect of blood compatibility; it does not assess thrombogenicity, complement activation, or platelet adhesion. Comprehensive hemocompatibility evaluation requires complementary tests such as platelet adhesion assays, thrombus formation assays, and coagulation studies.
Strengths & limitations
- Simple and rapid: the assay can be completed in hours, making it suitable for rapid screening of multiple materials.
- Standardized and quantitative: established protocols (ASTM F756, ISO 10993-4) ensure reproducibility and comparability across laboratories.
- Uses relevant biological fluid: direct interaction with human or animal blood provides physiologically relevant results.
- Cost-effective: minimal equipment and reagents required; suitable for high-throughput evaluation.
- Predictive of clinical outcome: hemolysis correlates well with clinical hemocompatibility and device safety.
- Static assay: does not account for shear stress, turbulence, or dynamic flow conditions that occur in vivo.
- Single endpoint: assesses only RBC damage, not other aspects of blood compatibility such as platelet activation or coagulation.
- Material dependency: results can vary with material particle size, morphology, and surface properties; standardization of material preparation is critical.
- Ethical and practical constraints: use of human blood requires informed consent, testing windows, and biohazard handling protocols.
Frequently asked
What hemolysis percentage is acceptable for regulatory approval?
ASTM F756 classifies hemolysis as: Grade A (≤2% hemolysis) = minimal response, Grade B (2–5%) = mild response, Grade C (5–10%) = moderate response, Grade D (10–50%) = marked response, Grade E (>50%) = severe response. Most regulatory agencies require Grade A or B (≤5% hemolysis) for blood-contacting devices.
Can I use archived or outdated blood for hemolysis testing?
Fresh blood is strongly preferred because RBC viability and hemoglobin stability decline over time. Most standards recommend using blood within 4 hours of collection, or up to 24 hours if stored at 4°C with appropriate anticoagulation. Outdated blood may show elevated baseline hemolysis and reduce assay sensitivity.
Why do I get high baseline hemolysis in my negative control?
High baseline hemolysis suggests improper RBC preparation (incomplete removal of plasma, lysis during washing), use of hypertonic or hypotonic buffers, or contamination. Check that the saline is isotonic (0.9% w/v), wash RBCs thoroughly to remove plasma, and ensure aseptic technique throughout.
Should I test with human blood or animal blood?
Regulatory standards typically require human blood for testing of devices intended for human use. If human blood is unavailable due to ethical or practical constraints, some standards permit animal blood (e.g., sheep or porcine) with appropriate justification, though results may not fully predict human response.
Does hemolysis testing account for shear stress or implantation trauma?
Standard hemolysis assays are static and do not reproduce in vivo shear stresses or mechanical trauma. To assess hemocompatibility under flow conditions, more complex assays using parallel-plate chambers or closed-loop bioreactors are available, though these are less routine and more expensive.
Sources
- ASTM F756-17 (2017). Standard Practice for Assessment of Hemolytic Properties of Materials. ASTM International. link ↗
- ISO 10993-4:2017. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Part 4: Selection of tests for interactions with blood. link ↗
- Tomos, M. S., Morrison, S., & Williams, D. F. (2012). Comparison of hemolytic methods for assessing the blood compatibility of biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 105(7), 1926-1933. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Hemolysis Assay Red Blood Cell Toxicity Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/biomaterials/hemolysis-assay
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- CAM AssayBiomaterials↔ compare
- ElectrospinningBiomaterials↔ compare
- Live/Dead AssayBiomaterials↔ compare
- MTT/MTS AssayBiomaterials↔ compare