Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Biomaterials›Hemolysis Assay
Process / pipelineBlood compatibility testing

Hemolysis Assay

Hemolysis Assay Red Blood Cell Toxicity Evaluation · Also known as: RBC lysis assay, hemolytic compatibility test, hemolytic potential test

The hemolysis assay is a standard method for evaluating the blood compatibility of biomaterials by quantifying the extent to which a material or substance damages red blood cells (RBCs) and causes hemoglobin release. Codified in standards including ASTM F756 and ISO 10993-4, the hemolysis assay is essential for regulatory approval of blood-contacting devices such as stents, catheters, artificial heart valves, and hemodialysis membranes. The assay provides a simple, quantitative measure of hemolytic potential that correlates with clinical safety.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Hemolysis Assay
CAM AssayElectrospinningLive/Dead AssayMTT/MTS Assay

When to use it

The hemolysis assay is mandatory for regulatory approval of any blood-contacting medical device and is highly recommended for any biomaterial or pharmaceutical agent intended for intravenous or intravascular use. It is preferred for rapid screening of candidate materials before more expensive in vivo biocompatibility studies. However, hemolysis is only one aspect of blood compatibility; it does not assess thrombogenicity, complement activation, or platelet adhesion. Comprehensive hemocompatibility evaluation requires complementary tests such as platelet adhesion assays, thrombus formation assays, and coagulation studies.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Simple and rapid: the assay can be completed in hours, making it suitable for rapid screening of multiple materials.
  • Standardized and quantitative: established protocols (ASTM F756, ISO 10993-4) ensure reproducibility and comparability across laboratories.
  • Uses relevant biological fluid: direct interaction with human or animal blood provides physiologically relevant results.
  • Cost-effective: minimal equipment and reagents required; suitable for high-throughput evaluation.
  • Predictive of clinical outcome: hemolysis correlates well with clinical hemocompatibility and device safety.
Limitations
  • Static assay: does not account for shear stress, turbulence, or dynamic flow conditions that occur in vivo.
  • Single endpoint: assesses only RBC damage, not other aspects of blood compatibility such as platelet activation or coagulation.
  • Material dependency: results can vary with material particle size, morphology, and surface properties; standardization of material preparation is critical.
  • Ethical and practical constraints: use of human blood requires informed consent, testing windows, and biohazard handling protocols.

Frequently asked

What hemolysis percentage is acceptable for regulatory approval?

ASTM F756 classifies hemolysis as: Grade A (≤2% hemolysis) = minimal response, Grade B (2–5%) = mild response, Grade C (5–10%) = moderate response, Grade D (10–50%) = marked response, Grade E (>50%) = severe response. Most regulatory agencies require Grade A or B (≤5% hemolysis) for blood-contacting devices.

Can I use archived or outdated blood for hemolysis testing?

Fresh blood is strongly preferred because RBC viability and hemoglobin stability decline over time. Most standards recommend using blood within 4 hours of collection, or up to 24 hours if stored at 4°C with appropriate anticoagulation. Outdated blood may show elevated baseline hemolysis and reduce assay sensitivity.

Why do I get high baseline hemolysis in my negative control?

High baseline hemolysis suggests improper RBC preparation (incomplete removal of plasma, lysis during washing), use of hypertonic or hypotonic buffers, or contamination. Check that the saline is isotonic (0.9% w/v), wash RBCs thoroughly to remove plasma, and ensure aseptic technique throughout.

Should I test with human blood or animal blood?

Regulatory standards typically require human blood for testing of devices intended for human use. If human blood is unavailable due to ethical or practical constraints, some standards permit animal blood (e.g., sheep or porcine) with appropriate justification, though results may not fully predict human response.

Does hemolysis testing account for shear stress or implantation trauma?

Standard hemolysis assays are static and do not reproduce in vivo shear stresses or mechanical trauma. To assess hemocompatibility under flow conditions, more complex assays using parallel-plate chambers or closed-loop bioreactors are available, though these are less routine and more expensive.

Sources

  1. ASTM F756-17 (2017). Standard Practice for Assessment of Hemolytic Properties of Materials. ASTM International. link ↗
  2. ISO 10993-4:2017. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices. Part 4: Selection of tests for interactions with blood. link ↗
  3. Tomos, M. S., Morrison, S., & Williams, D. F. (2012). Comparison of hemolytic methods for assessing the blood compatibility of biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 105(7), 1926-1933. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Hemolysis Assay Red Blood Cell Toxicity Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/biomaterials/hemolysis-assay

Related methods

CAM AssayElectrospinningLive/Dead AssayMTT/MTS Assay

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • CAM AssayBiomaterials↔ compare
  • ElectrospinningBiomaterials↔ compare
  • Live/Dead AssayBiomaterials↔ compare
  • MTT/MTS AssayBiomaterials↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

CAM AssayLive/Dead AssayMTT/MTS Assay

Similar methods

Swelling and DegradationCAM AssayBMP ReleaseMTT/MTS AssayContact Angle GoniometryScaffold Porosity AnalysisHydrogel RheologyDynamic Mechanical Analysis

Related reference concepts

Hematology and HemostasisHemolytic Anemia EvaluationLaboratory Diagnosis of Hemolytic Anemia: Hemolytic Markers and DifferentialHemolytic Anemia and Red-Cell DestructionComplete Blood Count (CBC)In Vitro Toxicity Models and Cell-Based Assays

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Hemolysis Assay (Hemolysis Assay Red Blood Cell Toxicity Evaluation). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/biomaterials/hemolysis-assay · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Clinical hematology traditions
Subfamily
Blood compatibility testing
Year
1950
Type
Hemolytic compatibility assay
Related methods
CAM AssayElectrospinningLive/Dead AssayMTT/MTS Assay
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account