m-Quotient (Hirsch m)
The m-quotient, defined by Jorge Hirsch in the same 2005 paper that introduced the h-index, normalizes an author's h-index by the length of their scientific career. Because the h-index can only grow over time and never decreases, raw h-values systematically favor senior researchers and make it unfair to compare early-career scientists with established ones. The m-quotient divides the h-index by the number of years since the researcher's first publication, yielding a rate of impact accumulation per year. Hirsch proposed rough benchmarks on this scale, suggesting that a sustained value near 1 characterizes a successful scientist, near 2 an outstanding one, and near 3 a truly exceptional figure, making the m-quotient a tool for comparing researchers at different career stages.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). m-Quotient (Hirsch's Career-Length-Normalized h-Index Rate). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/bibliometrics/m-quotient
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Contemporary h-IndexBibliometrics↔ compare
- g-Index (Egghe)Bibliometrics↔ compare
- hg-Index (Composite Hirsch-Egghe)Bibliometrics↔ compare