Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Architecture›Daylight Simulation
Process / pipelineLighting and visual comfort analysis

Daylight Simulation

Daylight Simulation and Daylighting Performance Analysis · Also known as: daylighting analysis, illuminance simulation, daylight availability assessment

Daylight Simulation is a computational method for predicting the availability and distribution of daylight in interior spaces and assessing visual comfort under varying sky conditions. Developed by researchers like Christoph Reinhart and John Mardaljevic in the 2000s, it has become central to designing healthy, energy-efficient buildings that maximize natural light while controlling glare.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Daylight Simulation
Acoustic Design AnalysisBuilding Energy Performa…Thermal Comfort Assessme…Green Building Rating Sy…Post-Occupancy Evaluation

When to use it

Apply daylight simulation in design development to optimize window size and placement, in parametric studies to evaluate shading strategies, to demonstrate compliance with building codes requiring daylighting, and to support claims of health and well-being benefits. It is increasingly required by green building rating systems.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Provides spatial and temporal resolution; reveals where and when daylight is available throughout the year
  • Enables quantitative optimization of window and shading design for daylight, energy, and glare control
  • Accounts for complex geometry including interior reflections, external obstructions, and dynamic shading
  • Supports regulatory compliance and pursuit of daylighting certifications
  • Integrates with occupant health considerations: adequate daylight linked to circadian rhythm regulation and well-being
Limitations
  • Computationally expensive for annual simulations with high spatial resolution; requires powerful processors or cloud computing
  • Results depend on accuracy of sky models and weather data, which may not reflect local microclimate effects
  • Interior reflectance properties are difficult to predict for real spaces; simplifying assumptions can introduce error
  • Dynamic shading introduces complexity; predictions depend on occupant behavior (when people open or close blinds)

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Daylight Factor and Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI)?

Daylight Factor is a static metric (percentage of exterior illuminance), useful for rough comparisons but ignoring sky conditions and seasonal variation. UDI is dynamic, measuring the percentage of work hours with illuminance between 100-3000 lux (adequate for task work without glare). UDI better reflects real occupancy and comfort.

How much should I increase window area to improve daylight penetration?

Doubling window area does not double daylight penetration. Light falls off with distance from windows; beyond 5-6 meters, supplementary electric lighting is needed. Simulation reveals the cost-benefit of larger windows versus energy penalty from increased solar heat gain.

Can I trust glare predictions from simulation, or should I validate with physical testing?

Glare indices from simulation (DGI, Daylight Glare Index) are reasonable predictors but assume standard eye positions and sensitivity. Validation with user surveys and physical mockups is recommended for critical spaces like hospitals or precision work areas.

How does exterior shading (trees, neighboring buildings) affect daylight inside?

External obstructions significantly reduce available daylight, especially in urban environments. Modern simulation includes buildings and vegetation in the 3D model. Including these context elements can reduce predicted illuminance by 30-50% compared to models that ignore neighboring structures.

Sources

  1. Reinhart, C. F., Mardaljevic, J., Rogers, Z. (2010). Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design. Leukos, 3(1), 7-31. DOI: 10.1582/LEUKOS.2006.03.01.001 ↗
  2. Mardaljevic, J. (2006). Examples of Climate-Based Daylight Modelling. Proceedings of the Lux Europa 2005 Conference. link ↗
  3. Wienold, J., Christoffersen, J. (2009). Evaluation of Discomfort Glare and its Dynamic Properties Using the Daylight Glare Index. Building and Environment, 44(9), 1921-1930. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Daylight Simulation and Daylighting Performance Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/architecture/daylight-simulation

Related methods

Acoustic Design AnalysisBuilding Energy Performance SimulationThermal Comfort Assessment

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Acoustic Design AnalysisArchitecture↔ compare
  • Building Energy Performance SimulationArchitecture↔ compare
  • Thermal Comfort AssessmentArchitecture↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Acoustic Design AnalysisBuilding Energy Performance SimulationGreen Building Rating SystemPost-Occupancy EvaluationThermal Comfort Assessment

Similar methods

Building Energy Performance SimulationSky View Factor AnalysisPost-Occupancy EvaluationSpace Syntax AnalysisThermal Comfort AssessmentAcoustic Ray TracingAcoustic Design AnalysisWayfinding Analysis

Related reference concepts

Shading and Reflectance ModelsRenderingRay Tracing and Global IlluminationSustainable and Ecological ArchitectureIndoor Air QualityClimate Modeling

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Daylight Simulation (Daylight Simulation and Daylighting Performance Analysis). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/architecture/daylight-simulation · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Christoph Reinhart, John Mardaljevic
Subfamily
Lighting and visual comfort analysis
Year
2006
Type
computational daylighting assessment method
Related methods
Acoustic Design AnalysisBuilding Energy Performance SimulationThermal Comfort Assessment
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account