Process / pipelinepublication-process
Responding to Peer Reviewer Comments: Revision Letter and Manuscript Revision
A response to reviewers (or 'revision letter') is a formal document that authors submit alongside a revised manuscript, addressing each reviewer comment point-by-point. The response letter shows the editor and reviewers that you have carefully considered their feedback, explained changes made in light of their suggestions, and justified any points of disagreement. A thoughtful, respectful response to reviewers significantly increases the likelihood of acceptance; a dismissive or defensive response can lead to rejection despite good science. The response letter is not an argument but a demonstration of engagement, transparency, and scientific integrity.
Find Topic with PaperMindSoonVideoSoon
Read the full method
Members only
Sign inSign in with a free account to read this section.
Sources
- Clydesdale, G. J., Seymour, K. J., & Toy, M. S. (2013). How to write a response to reviewers. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97(1), 1–2. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302835 ↗
- Wager, E., & Wieland, B. (2011). Responsibilities of journal editors. Lancet, 337(9834), 1807–1809. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60435-8 ↗
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link ↗