ScholarGate
Βοηθός

Σύγκριση μεθόδων

Εξετάστε τις επιλεγμένες μεθόδους δίπλα-δίπλα· οι γραμμές που διαφέρουν επισημαίνονται.

Μοντέλο TRIMP του Banister×Λόγος Φόρτου Εργασίας Οξείας-Χρόνιας×
ΠεδίοΕπιστήμη του ΑθλητισμούΕπιστήμη του Αθλητισμού
ΟικογένειαHypothesis testHypothesis test
Έτος προέλευσης19752016
ΔημιουργόςEric BanisterTim Gabbett
Τύποςmathematical modelingworkload monitoring
Θεμελιώδης πηγήBanister, E. W., Calvert, T. W., Savage, M. V., & Bach, T. (1975). A systems model of training responses and its relationship to muscular strength. Transactions of the ASME, 97(3), 177-183. link ↗Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The training-injury prevention paradox: should athletes be training smarter and harder? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 50(5), 273-280. DOI ↗
Εναλλακτικές ονομασίεςTRIMP, training impulse, fitness-fatigue modelACWR, workload ratio, training load balance
Συναφείς33
ΣύνοψηThe Training Impulse (TRIMP) model, developed by Eric Banister and colleagues (1975), quantifies the physiological stimulus of a training session by combining duration and intensity. The Banister fitness-fatigue model proposes that training effects on performance follow two opposing dynamics: fitness (beneficial) accumulates with time constant tau_f (~42 days) and fatigue (temporary decrement) accumulates faster but decays quickly (tau_d ~5-10 days). By tracking TRIMP and modeling these two processes, coaches can predict performance trajectories and optimize training load. Although superseded by newer frameworks, the Banister model remains influential and intuitive.The acute-chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is the ratio of acute training load (typically the past 1 week) to chronic training load (typically the rolling 4-week average). Formalized by Tim Gabbett (2016), ACWR is a widely adopted metric for predicting injury and illness risk in sports. The logic is straightforward: rapid increases in training load—when acute load spikes far above what the athlete has adapted to—exceed tissue tolerance and increase injury risk. Conversely, maintaining ACWR within optimal ranges (typically 0.8-1.3) is associated with better performance and lower injury incidence. ACWR monitoring is now standard in elite sports for load management.
ScholarGateΣύνολο δεδομένων
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Πηγές
  3. PUBLISHED

Μετάβαση στην αναζήτηση Λήψη διαφανειών

ScholarGateΣύγκριση μεθόδων: Banister TRIMP · Acute-Chronic Workload Ratio. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2026-06-19 από https://scholargate.app/el/compare