ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Wordscores×Wordfish×
FachgebietPsychometriePsychometrie
FamilieLatent structureLatent structure
Entstehungsjahr20032008
UrheberMichael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, John GarryJonathan Slapin, Svenja-Sophia Proksch
TypText analysis and dimension reductionGenerative text model for dimension reduction
Wegweisende QuelleLaver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331. DOI ↗Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S. O. (2008). A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 554-569. DOI ↗
Aliasnamen
Verwandt55
ZusammenfassungWordscores is a text-based scaling method developed by Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) that estimates the policy positions of political actors based on word frequencies in their texts. By comparing word usage in reference texts of known positions with test texts, the method infers the latent political dimension of any document without requiring manual coding or training data.Wordfish is a statistical model for scaling documents on latent dimensions, developed by Slapin and Proksch (2008). Unlike reference-based methods like Wordscores, Wordfish uses a Poisson generative model to jointly estimate word frequencies and document positions without requiring reference texts or manual annotation. It is particularly useful for estimating time-series changes in policy positions and can scale documents from multiple languages simultaneously.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Wordscores · Wordfish. Abgerufen am 2026-06-18 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare