Methoden vergleichen

	Textzusammenfassung – Extraktiv und Abstraktiv	Schlagwortextraktion
Fachgebiet	Text Mining	Text Mining
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	—	—
Urheber	—	—
Typ	NLP text-generation / text-reduction task	NLP text-mining task
Wegweisende Quelle	Nenkova, A. & McKeown, K. (2011). Automatic Summarization. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval.	Mihalcea, R. & Tarau, P. (2004). TextRank: Bringing Order into Texts. EMNLP, 404-411.
Aliasnamen	automatic summarization, extractive summarization, abstractive summarization, Otomatik Metin Özetleme	keyphrase extraction, key term extraction, Anahtar Kelime Çıkarma (Keyword Extraction)
Verwandt	4	4
Zusammenfassung	Automatic text summarization is a natural-language-processing task that condenses long documents into shorter summaries while preserving their key information. It works through one of two families of approaches — extractive summarization, which selects the most important spans from the source, or abstractive summarization, which generates new text. The field was consolidated by Nenkova and McKeown (2011), and sequence-to-sequence models such as BART (Lewis et al., 2020) advanced the abstractive side.	Keyword extraction is a natural-language-processing task that automatically identifies the words or phrases that best represent the content of a document. It turns a body of free text into a compact, ranked list of key terms, drawing on statistical, graph-based methods such as TextRank (Mihalcea & Tarau, 2004), or embedding-based methods such as KeyBERT (Grootendorst, 2020).