ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Systematische Literaturübersicht×PRISMA-basierte Übersicht×
FachgebietSzientometrieSzientometrie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1993 (Cochrane Collaboration); 2004 (Kitchenham SLR guidelines)2009 (original PRISMA statement); updated 2020
UrheberArchie Cochrane (conceptual foundation); formalized by the Cochrane Collaboration (1993) and Barbara Kitchenham in software engineering (2004)David Moher and PRISMA Group
TypEvidence synthesis methodologyStructured reporting framework for systematic reviews
Wegweisende QuelleKitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. link ↗Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. DOI ↗
AliasnamenSLR, systematic review, evidence synthesis review, structured literature reviewPRISMA review, PRISMA-guided systematic review, PRISMA 2020 review, PRISMA-compliant review
Verwandt55
ZusammenfassungA systematic literature review (SLR) is a structured, reproducible method for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all relevant studies on a research question. Unlike a narrative review, it follows an explicit, pre-specified protocol — from database search strings through inclusion criteria to data extraction — so that the process is transparent, auditable, and replicable by other researchers. It is widely used in medicine, education, software engineering, and the social sciences to produce the most comprehensive possible evidence base on a topic.A PRISMA-based review is a systematic literature review conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Originally published by Moher et al. in 2009 and updated as PRISMA 2020 by Page et al., the framework specifies a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram covering identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion — ensuring full transparency and reproducibility in the review process.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Systematic Literature Review · PRISMA-based review. Abgerufen am 2026-06-19 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare