ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Robuste nomologische Validität×Konstruktvalidität×
FachgebietPsychometriePsychometrie
FamilieLatent structureLatent structure
Entstehungsjahr19551955
UrheberCronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and CampbellLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
TypValidity assessment / construct validationValidity evaluation framework
Wegweisende QuelleCronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Aliasnamennomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNVconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Verwandt56
ZusammenfassungRobust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Robust Nomological Validity · Construct Validity. Abgerufen am 2026-06-15 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare