ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Retrospektive klinische Studie der Phase III×Randomisierte klinische Studie (RCT)×
FachgebietEpidemiologieEpidemiologie
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
EntstehungsjahrLate 20th century (ICH E8 1997; widespread retrospective Phase III use from 1990s onward)1948 (first rigorously conducted RCT — MRC streptomycin trial)
UrheberRegulatory framework codified by ICH E8/E9 (1997–1998); retrospective application developed through post-marketing and registry practiceAustin Bradford Hill; MRC Streptomycin Trial team
TypRetrospective comparative clinical studyInterventional experimental study
Wegweisende QuelleFriedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., & DeMets, D. L. (2010). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (4th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1441915856Friedman, L. M., Furberg, C. D., DeMets, D. L., Reboussin, D. M., & Granger, C. B. (2015). Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (5th ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-3319185385
Aliasnamenretrospective Phase III study, historical Phase III trial, Phase III retrospective analysis, retrospective comparative efficacy trialRCT, randomized controlled trial, randomised controlled trial, clinical randomized trial
Verwandt56
ZusammenfassungA retrospective Phase III clinical trial evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of an intervention against a control using data that were collected before the study was designed. Rather than enrolling new patients prospectively, researchers analyze existing records — from registries, hospital databases, or historical trial archives — to address a Phase III-level question: does Treatment A outperform the current standard of care in a large, representative patient population? This design is used when prospective enrollment is infeasible, unethical, or when historical data are sufficiently complete to support a rigorous comparison.A randomized clinical trial (RCT) is an experimental study design in which participants are randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group, then followed prospectively to compare outcomes. Random allocation is the defining feature: it distributes known and unknown confounders across groups by chance, making the RCT the strongest individual study design for establishing causal efficacy of a treatment or intervention under controlled conditions.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Retrospective phase III clinical trial · Randomized clinical trial. Abgerufen am 2026-06-20 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare