ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Propensity Score Matching in der Bildungsforschung×Propensity Score Weighting (PSW / IPW)×
FachgebietKausale InferenzKausale Inferenz
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Entstehungsjahr1983 (foundational); education adoption widespread from late 1990s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
UrheberRosenbaum & Rubin (1983); widely adopted in education research via Shadish, Cook & Campbell (2002)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypQuasi-experimental / matching-based causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Wegweisende QuelleRosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasnamenPSM in education, educational PSM, PSM for program evaluation in schools, propensity matching educationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Verwandt56
ZusammenfassungPropensity Score Matching (PSM) in education research is a quasi-experimental technique that creates comparable treatment and control groups from observational student, teacher, or school data. By balancing groups on observed background characteristics, it enables credible causal estimates of educational interventions — such as tutoring programs, school choice policies, or teacher professional development — when random assignment is infeasible.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Propensity Score Matching in Education Research · Propensity Score Weighting. Abgerufen am 2026-06-20 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare