ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Propagandaerkennung×Frame Analysis×
FachgebietText MiningText Mining
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1982
UrheberCharles J. Fillmore
TypNLP text-classification taskNLP frame-semantic parsing task
Wegweisende QuelleDa San Martino, G. et al. (2019). Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articles. EMNLP. DOI ↗Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing. ISBN: 9788970050355
Aliasnamenpropaganda and manipulation detection, propaganda technique detection, Propaganda ve Manipülasyon Tespitiframe semantics, frame-semantic parsing, FrameNet analysis, Çerçeve Analizi (Frame Analysis) — NLP
Verwandt44
ZusammenfassungPropaganda detection is a natural-language-processing task that automatically identifies and labels persuasion and manipulation techniques in text — such as loaded language, oversimplified solutions, bandwagon appeals, and glittering generalities. It builds on the fine-grained propaganda analysis introduced by Da San Martino et al. (2019), turning rhetorical manipulation into structured, technique-level labels.Frame analysis is a FrameNet-based natural-language-processing task that detects the semantic frames evoked in text and the participant roles (frame-evoking elements and frame elements, FE) that fill them. Rooted in Charles Fillmore's frame semantics (1982) and operationalised by the Berkeley FrameNet Project (Baker et al., 1998), it is widely used to analyse media discourse and political text.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Propaganda Detection · Frame Analysis. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare