ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Propagandaerkennung×Emotionserkennung in Texten×
FachgebietText MiningText Mining
FamilieProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr1992
UrheberPaul Ekman (basic-emotions theory)
TypNLP text-classification taskNLP text-classification task
Wegweisende QuelleDa San Martino, G. et al. (2019). Fine-Grained Analysis of Propaganda in News Articles. EMNLP. DOI ↗Ekman, P. (1992). An Argument for Basic Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3-4), 169-200. DOI ↗
Aliasnamenpropaganda and manipulation detection, propaganda technique detection, Propaganda ve Manipülasyon Tespitiemotion recognition, emotion classification, Duygu/His Tespiti (Emotion Detection)
Verwandt43
ZusammenfassungPropaganda detection is a natural-language-processing task that automatically identifies and labels persuasion and manipulation techniques in text — such as loaded language, oversimplified solutions, bandwagon appeals, and glittering generalities. It builds on the fine-grained propaganda analysis introduced by Da San Martino et al. (2019), turning rhetorical manipulation into structured, technique-level labels.Emotion detection is a natural-language-processing task that classifies the basic and complex emotions expressed in text — fear, joy, anger, sadness, surprise, and disgust — within a recognised emotion framework such as Ekman's basic-emotions model or Plutchik's wheel. It builds on Paul Ekman's 1992 argument for a small set of universal basic emotions, going beyond a simple positive/negative split to attach a specific emotion label to each piece of text.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Propaganda Detection · Emotion Detection. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare