Methoden vergleichen
Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.
| Nürnberger Kodex× | Informierte Einwilligung in der Forschung× | |
|---|---|---|
| Fachgebiet | Forschungsethik | Forschungsethik |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Entstehungsjahr | 1947 | 1947 |
| Urheber≠ | International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (Allied Powers) | Multiple (Nuremberg Code 1947 first principle; formalized in Belmont Report 1979, Declaration of Helsinki 1964; US Common Rule 45 CFR 46) |
| Typ≠ | Framework | Guideline |
| Wegweisende Quelle≠ | Nuremberg Military Tribunal. (1947). Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. United States Government Printing Office. link ↗ | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register. link ↗ |
| Aliasnamen | Code of Nuremberg, Ten Principles | Research Consent, Informed Consent Process |
| Verwandt | 4 | 4 |
| Zusammenfassung≠ | The Nuremberg Code (1947) is the first international ethical code governing human experimentation, established by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg following trials of Nazi physicians for conducting torture and unethical experiments on concentration camp prisoners. Its ten principles, led by absolute requirement for voluntary informed consent, became the foundation for all modern research ethics governance and remain the gold standard for protecting research subjects from exploitation and abuse. | Informed consent is the cornerstone of ethical human subjects research, requiring researchers to disclose material information about a study and obtain voluntary agreement from subjects before participation. Established as the first principle of the Nuremberg Code (1947) and formalized in subsequent ethical frameworks (Declaration of Helsinki 1964, Belmont Report 1979), informed consent protects subject autonomy, enables risk-benefit assessment, and creates accountability. Effective informed consent requires far more than obtaining a signature—it demands clear communication, genuine comprehension, and authentic voluntariness. |
| ScholarGateDatensatz ↗ |
|
|