Methoden vergleichen

	Feldtheoretische Kritische Diskursanalyse	Institutionelle Ethnographie
Fachgebiet	Qualitativ	Qualitativ
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Entstehungsjahr	1999–2001	1970s–1987 (developed through the 1970s–80s; consolidated in Smith 1987, 2005)
Urheber	Norman Fairclough and Lilie Chouliaraki (synthesis with Bourdieu's field theory)	Dorothy E. Smith
Typ	Qualitative critical discourse framework	Qualitative research method
Wegweisende Quelle	Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510357	Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010
Aliasnamen	Field-theoretic CDA, Bourdieusian CDA, sociological CDA, field-oriented discourse analysis	IE, sociology for people, institutional ethnographic inquiry, Smith's institutional ethnography
Verwandt	5	6
Zusammenfassung	Field-based Critical Discourse Analysis (Field-based CDA) integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — structured social spaces with their own rules, capital, and positions — with the linguistic and critical tools of Critical Discourse Analysis. The approach examines how language constructs, legitimates, and contests power relations within specific institutional or social fields, situating texts in their broader sociological context rather than treating discourse in isolation.	Institutional Ethnography (IE) is a qualitative research method developed by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith that investigates how people's everyday lives are shaped and coordinated by institutional texts, rules, and relations of power. Starting from the lived experience of individuals in a particular standpoint, IE traces the social organization that governs their work and troubles — revealing how macro-level institutions operate through the micro-level activities of real people.