ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergleichen

Prüfen Sie die ausgewählten Methoden nebeneinander; abweichende Zeilen sind hervorgehoben.

Diskriminante Validität×Konvergente Validität×
FachgebietPsychometriePsychometrie
FamilieLatent structureLatent structure
Entstehungsjahr19591959
UrheberDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. FiskeDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
TypValidity evidence / psychometric evaluationValidity evidence / construct validation
Wegweisende QuelleCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Aliasnamendiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validityconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Verwandt54
ZusammenfassungDiscriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateDatensatz
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Quellen
  3. PUBLISHED

Zur Suche Folien herunterladen

ScholarGateMethoden vergleichen: Discriminant Validity · Convergent Validity. Abgerufen am 2026-06-17 von https://scholargate.app/de/compare